Women living in world regions where HIV
infection is common are at high risk of acquiring HIV infection during
pregnancy and the postpartum period, according to a study by US
researchers published in this week’s PLOS Medicine. Alison Drake
and colleagues from the University of Washington in Seattle also found
that mothers who acquire HIV during pregnancy or postpartum are more
likely to pass the infection on to their offspring than mothers with
chronic HIV infections.
The authors reached these conclusions by
reviewing relevant published studies and then using a model to estimate
the HIV incidence rate and the association between pregnancy and
postpartum status, HIV incidence and the risk and rates of mother to
child transmission .
The authors found that the combined HIV
incidence rate among pregnant/postpartum women was 3.8/100 person-years.
Furthermore, the number of new infections per number of people at risk
was significantly higher in African countries than in non-African
countries at 3.6 per cent and 0.3 per cent respectively. The authors
also found that among African women, the risk of MTCT was 2.9-fold
higher during the postpartum period among those who had recently
acquired HIV than among those with chronic HIV infection, and 2.3-fold
higher during the pregnancy/postpartum periods combined.
Although limited by differences in the
quality of the studies included in this review, these findings have
important implications: they suggest that women living in regions where
HIV infection is common should be offered repeat HIV testing during
pregnancy and in the postpartum period to detect incident HIV
infections, and that preventing HIV transmission during pregnancy and
the postpartum period should be prioritized, for example, by counseling
women about the need to use condoms to prevent transmission during this
period of their lives.
The authors say: “Detection and
prevention of incident HIV in pregnancy/postpartum should be
prioritized, and is critical to decrease [mother to child transmission.
The latest CDC obesity data, published in the February 26 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association,
show a significant decline in obesity among children aged 2 to 5 years.
Obesity prevalence for this age group went from nearly 14 per cent in
2003-2004 to just over 8 per cent in 2011-2012 — a decline of 43 per
cent — based on CDC’s National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
data. Although the JAMA study does not specifically compare 2009-2010
with 2011-2012, NHANES data does show a decline in the 2 to 5 year old
age group during that time period — from just over 12 percent in
2009-2010 to just over 8 percent in 2011-2012.
“We continue to see signs that, for some
children in this country, the scales are tipping. This report comes on
the heels of previous CDC data that found a significant decline in
obesity prevalence among low-income children aged 2 to 4 years
participating in federal nutrition programs,” said CDC Director Tom
Frieden, M.D., M.P.H. “We’ve also seen signs from communities around the
country with obesity prevention programs including Anchorage, Alaska,
Philadelphia, New York City and King County, Washington. This confirms
that at least for kids, we can turn the tide and begin to reverse the
obesity epidemic.”
While the precise reasons for the
decline in obesity among 2 to 5 year olds are not clear, many child care
centers have started to improve their nutrition and physical activity
standards over the past few years. In addition, CDC data show decreases
in consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages among youth in recent years.
Another possible factor might be the improvement in breastfeeding rates
in the United States, which is beneficial to staving off obesity in
breastfed children.
“I am thrilled at the progress we’ve
made over the last few years in obesity rates among our youngest
Americans,” said Michelle Obama, First Lady of the United States of
America. “With the participation of kids, parents, and communities in
Let’s Move! these last four years, healthier habits are beginning to
become the new norm.”
No comments:
Post a Comment