At about 3pm on Sunday, June, 2012, an 
aircraft, a Boeing, MD-83 plane, with registration number 5N-RAM, 
operated by Dana Airlines Limited, crashed into two houses in Iju 
Ishaga, a suburb of Lagos metropolis, killing all 146 passengers and 
seven crew members on board, in addition to unspecified number of people
 on ground. The plane which went down in a densely populated area, was 
about two minutes to touch down at the Domestic Terminal of the Murtala 
Muhammed Airport in Lagos.
Official reactions were not late in 
coming. President Goodluck Jonathan declared three days of national 
mourning in honour of the victims of the air disaster, cancelled all his
 public engagements scheduled for Monday, June 4, 2012, and directed 
that the national flag be flown half-mast for the three days of 
mourning. The President commiserated with and prayed for the families of
 the victims of the crash. He also assured all air travelers in the 
country that every possible effort would be made to ensure that the 
right lessons were learnt from the tragic loss of valuable lives in the 
plane crash and that further measures would be put in place to boost 
aviation safety in the country.  The former Minister of Aviation, Ms 
Stella Oduah, did not only visit the crash site on the day of the 
incident, she also pledged a full scale investigation into the causes of
 the air disaster, a pledge serially re-echoed by Nigeria Civil Aviation
 Authority.
On Monday, June 4, 2012, the President 
Jonathan, and Governors Babatunde Fashola of Lagos State and Ibikunle 
Amosun of Ogun State visited the crash site in demonstration of their 
concern over the incident. The Ministry of Aviation suspended 
indefinitely Dana Air’s operation license to enable NCAA to carry out 
investigation into the incident. The license has since been restored and
 Dana Air is in the air again.
Sadly, government’s swift reactions to 
the Dana Air disaster were  very familiar. In Nigeria, official 
expression of grief, public exhibition of sadness and assurance of 
rectitude over plane crashes has become a classic shedding of crocodile 
tears. Any time there is an air disaster in Nigeria, officials of state 
issue statements condoling with the families of the victims and assuring
 Nigerians that concrete steps will be taken to prevent a recurrence. 
During the Olusegun Obasanjo’s presidency, when plane crashes became the
 face of the Nigerian aviation industry, a stakeholder’s forum, was 
convened and presided over by the President and broadcast live on 
national television, to find lasting solutions to the problems of air 
safety plaguing the aviation sector. Thereafter, some money was voted, 
as a special intervention fund, to revamp the aviation sector. We all 
are aware that the money later became the subject of corruption 
allegations and criminal prosecutions, involving not only two Ministers 
of Aviation, but also their aides.
And so, the ritual went on. The media  
focused on the aviation sector, inundating the public  with 
attention-competing statements of  government officials nationwide, 
expressing deep sorrow over the tragic incident, and commiserating with 
the families of the bereaved. Nigerians were  reminded of many things 
that were wrong with the aviation sector: inadequate funding of the 
system; failure and corruption of regulatory agencies; deterioration and
 lack of maintenance of airports and equipment; archaic and obsolete 
navigational system; aging aircrafts that are not fit to fly anymore; 
and weak, fund strapped airlines that increasingly resort, in order to 
remain in business, to aircraft-overuse, corner-cutting, periodic 
technical-checks skipping, and improvisation, thereby jeopardising the 
lives of air travelers and crew members.
The Accidents Investigation Bureau of 
NCAA recovered the black box. Special prayers for the repose of the 
souls of the departed were held in places of worship nationwide. 
Intervention strategies were articulated, including merger and 
consolidation of airlines, and a further massive injection of funds, as 
 rescue stimulus, in order to strengthen and enable airlines operating 
in Nigeria buy newer and safer aircrafts. After a while, the aviation 
sector settled back into business as usual, and our people returned  to 
the skies to fly by faith, and meet with the inescapable dictate of 
fate, against which we are told there is no armour. The vicious cycle 
continued.
But are Nigerians so helpless in the 
circumstances? Is there nothing we can do to prevent these avoidable air
 disasters and the attendant deaths? Is the law so inadequate or 
impotent that it cannot help to prevent these recurring air disasters? 
Has government been faithful and sincere in awarding punishments or 
sanctions for dereliction of duties, negligence, unethical practices and
 acts of corruption in the aviation sector, in order to deter 
culpability resulting in avoidable or preventable plane crashes? If 
government has not been faithful and sincere, and is not likely to be, 
what options are available to the citizenry; and if government has been 
faithful and sincere, but these sanctions and punishments are not 
effective in preventing avoidable air disasters in Nigeria, what other 
steps should government take?  Is it even reasonable or logical to 
expect a government that has left the roads in a terrible state of 
disrepair, leading to perennial road crashes and attendant deaths to 
ensure air safety? Can a government that cannot guarantee security of 
lives and property in our country, which is now in the throes of armed 
robberies, assassinations, kidnapping, insurgent bloodletting, and 
inter-communal slaughter, be trusted to guarantee air security and 
safety?
We have painfully observed that in the 
past two decades, whereas all sorts of measures have been taken by 
government following air disasters in Nigeria, Nigerians have yet to see
 any action in the direction of criminal investigation and prosecution 
of officials of the aviation industry, particularly officials that are 
responsible for checks and certification of aircrafts in the regulatory 
agencies, and the management of airlines, whose misconduct might have 
resulted in those air disasters.
Section 3 (a & b) of the Federal 
Airports Authority of Nigeria Act provides that “the principal functions
 of the Authority shall be—(a) to develop, provide and maintain at 
airports and within the Nigerian air space all necessary services and 
facilities for the safe, orderly, expeditious and economic operation of 
air transport; and  (b) to provide adequate conditions under which 
passengers and goods may be carried by air and under which aircraft may 
be used for other gainful purposes, and for prohibiting the carriage by 
air of goods of such classes as may be prescribed.”
The Nigerian Airspace Management Agency 
(Establishment Etc )Act Cap N90 PART III Section 7 lists the functions 
of the Agency. They  include “provision of  air traffic services in 
Nigeria, including air traffic control, visual and non-visual aids, 
aeronautical telecommunications services and electricity supplies 
relating thereto, to enable public transport, private, business and 
military aircraft fly, as far as practicable and as safely as possible; 
provision of aerodromes at all the major Nigerian airports, the 
navigation services necessary for the operation of aircraft taking-off 
and landing and integrate them into the overall flow of air traffic 
within the Nigerian airspace; generally securing  the safety, efficiency
 and regularity of air navigation; and procuring, installing and 
maintaining adequate communication, navigation and surveillance and air 
traffic management facilities at all airports in Nigeria.”
Under Section 7 Part III of the Nigerian
 Civil Aviation Authority ( Establishment, Etc  Act), Cap 94 some of the
 functions of NCAA are that the NCAA shall “order the inspection of 
aircraft, aircraft manufacturers and maintenance facilities or 
organisations, training facilities (including simulators), and other 
appliances designed for use in air transportation, as may be necessary 
to enable the Authority to determine the issuance or granting of a 
certificate of registration or approval to such aircraft, aircraft 
manufacturer and maintenance facilities or organization and other 
applicable appliances; issue, renew or validate a certificate of 
airworthiness in respect of aircraft, and specify in the certificate of 
airworthiness by regulations, the duration of such certificate of 
airworthiness, the type of service for which the aircraft may be used 
and such other terms, conditions or limitations as are required in the 
interest of safety; and prohibit any Nigerian registered aircraft or 
foreign registered aircraft from operating within the Nigerian airspace 
unless certificates of airworthiness are issued or validated under the 
regulations in force with respect to the aircraft”
When the duties imposed by these 
legislations are breached, and the duty of care imposed by these laws, 
the Civil Aviation Act, and other laws are breached by  aviation 
officials, airline owners and operators, are civil sanctions the only 
remedy? The answer is no.
Under our criminal laws, criminal 
negligence can be prosecuted. “It is the duty of every person who has in
 his charge or under his control anything whether living or inanimate, 
and whether moving or stationary, of such a nature that, if the absence 
of care or precaution in its use or management, the life, safety or 
health of any person may be endangered, to use reasonable care and take 
reasonable precautions to avoid such danger; and he is held to have 
caused any consequences which result to the life or health of any person
 by reason of any omission to perform that duty”; “ when  a person 
undertakes to do any act, the omission to do which is or may be 
dangerous to human life or health, it is his duty to do that act; and he
 is held to have caused any consequences which may result to the life or
 health of any person by reason of any omission to perform that duty”; 
“a person who unlawfully kills another in such circumstances as not to 
constitute murder is guilty of manslaughter ; any person who commits the
 offence of manslaughter, is liable to imprisonment for life”. ( See 
Sections 304,305, 317 and 325 of the Criminal Code Act, Cap C38, Vol. 4 
LFN, 2004.)
So, the law is not dumb. The question 
is, when are we going to move away from fixation on insurance claims and
 compensation for the  avoidable deaths, and creatively move to criminal
 prosecution of offenders in the aviation sector?
•Ogunye is the principal counsel, Jiti Ogunye Chambers, Lagos

 
No comments:
Post a Comment