Sunday 2 March 2014

Air crashes: Need for criminal prosecution

At about 3pm on Sunday, June, 2012, an aircraft, a Boeing, MD-83 plane, with registration number 5N-RAM, operated by Dana Airlines Limited, crashed into two houses in Iju Ishaga, a suburb of Lagos metropolis, killing all 146 passengers and seven crew members on board, in addition to unspecified number of people on ground. The plane which went down in a densely populated area, was about two minutes to touch down at the Domestic Terminal of the Murtala Muhammed Airport in Lagos.
Official reactions were not late in coming. President Goodluck Jonathan declared three days of national mourning in honour of the victims of the air disaster, cancelled all his public engagements scheduled for Monday, June 4, 2012, and directed that the national flag be flown half-mast for the three days of mourning. The President commiserated with and prayed for the families of the victims of the crash. He also assured all air travelers in the country that every possible effort would be made to ensure that the right lessons were learnt from the tragic loss of valuable lives in the plane crash and that further measures would be put in place to boost aviation safety in the country.  The former Minister of Aviation, Ms Stella Oduah, did not only visit the crash site on the day of the incident, she also pledged a full scale investigation into the causes of the air disaster, a pledge serially re-echoed by Nigeria Civil Aviation Authority.
On Monday, June 4, 2012, the President Jonathan, and Governors Babatunde Fashola of Lagos State and Ibikunle Amosun of Ogun State visited the crash site in demonstration of their concern over the incident. The Ministry of Aviation suspended indefinitely Dana Air’s operation license to enable NCAA to carry out investigation into the incident. The license has since been restored and Dana Air is in the air again.
Sadly, government’s swift reactions to the Dana Air disaster were  very familiar. In Nigeria, official expression of grief, public exhibition of sadness and assurance of rectitude over plane crashes has become a classic shedding of crocodile tears. Any time there is an air disaster in Nigeria, officials of state issue statements condoling with the families of the victims and assuring Nigerians that concrete steps will be taken to prevent a recurrence. During the Olusegun Obasanjo’s presidency, when plane crashes became the face of the Nigerian aviation industry, a stakeholder’s forum, was convened and presided over by the President and broadcast live on national television, to find lasting solutions to the problems of air safety plaguing the aviation sector. Thereafter, some money was voted, as a special intervention fund, to revamp the aviation sector. We all are aware that the money later became the subject of corruption allegations and criminal prosecutions, involving not only two Ministers of Aviation, but also their aides.
And so, the ritual went on. The media  focused on the aviation sector, inundating the public  with attention-competing statements of  government officials nationwide, expressing deep sorrow over the tragic incident, and commiserating with the families of the bereaved. Nigerians were  reminded of many things that were wrong with the aviation sector: inadequate funding of the system; failure and corruption of regulatory agencies; deterioration and lack of maintenance of airports and equipment; archaic and obsolete navigational system; aging aircrafts that are not fit to fly anymore; and weak, fund strapped airlines that increasingly resort, in order to remain in business, to aircraft-overuse, corner-cutting, periodic technical-checks skipping, and improvisation, thereby jeopardising the lives of air travelers and crew members.
The Accidents Investigation Bureau of NCAA recovered the black box. Special prayers for the repose of the souls of the departed were held in places of worship nationwide. Intervention strategies were articulated, including merger and consolidation of airlines, and a further massive injection of funds, as  rescue stimulus, in order to strengthen and enable airlines operating in Nigeria buy newer and safer aircrafts. After a while, the aviation sector settled back into business as usual, and our people returned  to the skies to fly by faith, and meet with the inescapable dictate of fate, against which we are told there is no armour. The vicious cycle continued.
But are Nigerians so helpless in the circumstances? Is there nothing we can do to prevent these avoidable air disasters and the attendant deaths? Is the law so inadequate or impotent that it cannot help to prevent these recurring air disasters? Has government been faithful and sincere in awarding punishments or sanctions for dereliction of duties, negligence, unethical practices and acts of corruption in the aviation sector, in order to deter culpability resulting in avoidable or preventable plane crashes? If government has not been faithful and sincere, and is not likely to be, what options are available to the citizenry; and if government has been faithful and sincere, but these sanctions and punishments are not effective in preventing avoidable air disasters in Nigeria, what other steps should government take?  Is it even reasonable or logical to expect a government that has left the roads in a terrible state of disrepair, leading to perennial road crashes and attendant deaths to ensure air safety? Can a government that cannot guarantee security of lives and property in our country, which is now in the throes of armed robberies, assassinations, kidnapping, insurgent bloodletting, and inter-communal slaughter, be trusted to guarantee air security and safety?
We have painfully observed that in the past two decades, whereas all sorts of measures have been taken by government following air disasters in Nigeria, Nigerians have yet to see any action in the direction of criminal investigation and prosecution of officials of the aviation industry, particularly officials that are responsible for checks and certification of aircrafts in the regulatory agencies, and the management of airlines, whose misconduct might have resulted in those air disasters.
Section 3 (a & b) of the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria Act provides that “the principal functions of the Authority shall be—(a) to develop, provide and maintain at airports and within the Nigerian air space all necessary services and facilities for the safe, orderly, expeditious and economic operation of air transport; and  (b) to provide adequate conditions under which passengers and goods may be carried by air and under which aircraft may be used for other gainful purposes, and for prohibiting the carriage by air of goods of such classes as may be prescribed.”
The Nigerian Airspace Management Agency (Establishment Etc )Act Cap N90 PART III Section 7 lists the functions of the Agency. They  include “provision of  air traffic services in Nigeria, including air traffic control, visual and non-visual aids, aeronautical telecommunications services and electricity supplies relating thereto, to enable public transport, private, business and military aircraft fly, as far as practicable and as safely as possible; provision of aerodromes at all the major Nigerian airports, the navigation services necessary for the operation of aircraft taking-off and landing and integrate them into the overall flow of air traffic within the Nigerian airspace; generally securing  the safety, efficiency and regularity of air navigation; and procuring, installing and maintaining adequate communication, navigation and surveillance and air traffic management facilities at all airports in Nigeria.”
Under Section 7 Part III of the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority ( Establishment, Etc  Act), Cap 94 some of the functions of NCAA are that the NCAA shall “order the inspection of aircraft, aircraft manufacturers and maintenance facilities or organisations, training facilities (including simulators), and other appliances designed for use in air transportation, as may be necessary to enable the Authority to determine the issuance or granting of a certificate of registration or approval to such aircraft, aircraft manufacturer and maintenance facilities or organization and other applicable appliances; issue, renew or validate a certificate of airworthiness in respect of aircraft, and specify in the certificate of airworthiness by regulations, the duration of such certificate of airworthiness, the type of service for which the aircraft may be used and such other terms, conditions or limitations as are required in the interest of safety; and prohibit any Nigerian registered aircraft or foreign registered aircraft from operating within the Nigerian airspace unless certificates of airworthiness are issued or validated under the regulations in force with respect to the aircraft”
When the duties imposed by these legislations are breached, and the duty of care imposed by these laws, the Civil Aviation Act, and other laws are breached by  aviation officials, airline owners and operators, are civil sanctions the only remedy? The answer is no.
Under our criminal laws, criminal negligence can be prosecuted. “It is the duty of every person who has in his charge or under his control anything whether living or inanimate, and whether moving or stationary, of such a nature that, if the absence of care or precaution in its use or management, the life, safety or health of any person may be endangered, to use reasonable care and take reasonable precautions to avoid such danger; and he is held to have caused any consequences which result to the life or health of any person by reason of any omission to perform that duty”; “ when  a person undertakes to do any act, the omission to do which is or may be dangerous to human life or health, it is his duty to do that act; and he is held to have caused any consequences which may result to the life or health of any person by reason of any omission to perform that duty”; “a person who unlawfully kills another in such circumstances as not to constitute murder is guilty of manslaughter ; any person who commits the offence of manslaughter, is liable to imprisonment for life”. ( See Sections 304,305, 317 and 325 of the Criminal Code Act, Cap C38, Vol. 4 LFN, 2004.)
So, the law is not dumb. The question is, when are we going to move away from fixation on insurance claims and compensation for the  avoidable deaths, and creatively move to criminal prosecution of offenders in the aviation sector?
•Ogunye is the principal counsel, Jiti Ogunye Chambers, Lagos

No comments:

Post a Comment