An Indiana University study in
collaboration with medical researchers from Karolinska Institute in
Stockholm has found that advancing paternal age at childbearing can lead
to higher rates of psychiatric and academic problems in offspring than
previously estimated.
Examining an immense data set — everyone
born in Sweden from 1973 until 2001 — the researchers documented a
compelling association between advancing paternal age at childbearing
and numerous psychiatric disorders and educational problems in their
children, including autism, ADHD, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia,
suicide attempts and substance abuse problems. Academic problems
included failing grades,
low educational attainment and low IQ scores.
Among the findings: When compared to a
child born to a 24-year-old father, a child born to a 45-year-old father
is 3.5 times more likely to have autism, 13 times more likely to have
ADHD, two times more likely to have a psychotic disorder, 25 times more
likely to have bipolar disorder and 2.5 times more likely to have
suicidal behaviour or a substance abuse problem.
For most of these problems, the
likelihood of the disorder increased steadily with advancing paternal
age, suggesting there is no particular paternal age at childbearing that
suddenly becomes problematic.
“We were shocked by the findings,” said
Brian D’Onofrio, lead author and associate professor in the Department
of Psychological and Brain Sciences in the College of Arts and Sciences
at IU Bloomington. “The specific associations with paternal age were
much, much larger than in previous studies. In fact, we found that
advancing paternal age was associated with greater risk for several
problems, such as ADHD, suicide attempts and substance use problems,
whereas traditional research designs suggested advancing paternal age
may have diminished the rate at which these problems occur.”
The study, “Parental Age at Childbearing and Offspring Psychiatric and Academic Morbidity,” was published in JAMA Psychiatry.
Notably, the researchers found
converging evidence for the associations with advancing paternal age at
childbearing from multiple research designs for a broad range of
problems in offspring. By comparing siblings, which accounts for all
factors that make children living in the same house similar, researchers
discovered that the associations with advancing paternal age were much
greater than estimates in the general population. By comparing cousins,
including first-born cousins, the researchers could examine whether
birth order or the influences of one sibling on another could account
for the findings.
The authors also statistically
controlled for parents’ highest level of education and income, factors
often thought to counteract the negative effects of advancing paternal
age because older parents are more likely to be more mature and
financially stable. The findings were remarkably consistent, however, as
the specific associations with advancing paternal age remained.
“The findings in this study are more
informative than many previous studies,” D’Onofrio said. “First, we had
the largest sample size for a study on paternal age. Second, we
predicted numerous psychiatric and academic problems that are associated
with significant impairment. Finally, we were able to estimate the
association between paternal age at childbearing and these problems
while comparing differentially exposed siblings, as well as cousins.
These approaches allowed us to control for many factors that other
studies could not.”
The results of D'Onofrio et al. have been alarmingly exaggerated due to errors in the press release put out by Dr. D'Onofrio. See my blog post http://ow.ly/v6ehS for details.
ReplyDeleteSteve Herman, PhD
Associate Professor of Psychology
University of Hawaii at Hilo