Wednesday, 12 March 2014

FIGHT AGAINST BOKO HARAM: "Continue Praying For Us In Our Ongoing Operations - Army Appeals

The Spokesman of the division, Col. Muhammmad Dole, made the appeal during an interactive session with newsmen in Maiduguri.
He said “we are appealing to residents to continue praying for us in our ongoing operations against the insurgents.
“We are also calling on the people to cooperate and assist with useful information that could help in the success of our operations.’’
He commended the local vigilance group popularly called Civilian JTF for assisting the military in its operations.
He said “I must commend the efforts of the Civilian JTF toward assisting us in ensuring that we succeed in the operations.
“The Civilian JTF is actually adding colour to what the military is doing in the fight against the insurgents.’’
Dole said although there were some minor lapses on the part of the Civilian JTF, the overall performance of the vigilance group had been commendable.
“One important point is that members of Civilian JTF are not professionals, but surprisingly they have been able to live up to their expectations,’’ he added.
READ MORE:  http://news.naij.com/61614.html

Champions League: Messi Helps Barca To Secure Victory, Manchester City Is Out (PHOTO & VIDEO)

Lionel Messi struck again for Barcelona by scoring a superb goal on 67th minute
READ MORE:  http://news.naij.com/61629.html

Two Alternatives For Boko Haram: Embrace Dialogue, Or Face Full FG’s Might

A picture taken from a video distributed to journalists in recent days through intermediaries and obtained by AFP on March 5, 2013 reportedly shows Abubakar Shekau (center), the suspected leader of Islamist extremist group, flanked by six armed and hooded
Mark said that if the Islamist sect would not embrace dialogue with authorities to address "whatever grievances they may have", the FG "would be left with no option than to deploy its might" to deal with the problem.
"No matter how disgruntled or angry they may be, they cannot continue to kill our citizens and destroy property at will as way of life. "It is a high time wise counsel prevailed among these insurgents to drop their arms and embrace peace," Senate President said.
Mark, however, did not disclose what exactly the FG would do should no dialogue happen.
Expressing concern about the increased number of attacks by the insurgents, Mark said that Nigeria has enough challenges to deals with "and certainly does not need these wars and destructions".
"We need to live and work together as free people. We need a country where all citizens have equal opportunities, where no one is oppressed or molested," he added.
Mark also sympathised with Benue State governor Gabriel Suswam, who was attacked by gunmen at Tse-Kenyi village while inspecting the destroyed community.

Know more about this news? Update the info!
RELATED ARTICLES:
BOKO HARAM: Nigeria Military Shuts Down Telephone Lines In Borno
FIGHT AGAINST BOKO HARAM: "Continue Praying For Us In Our Ongoing Operations - Army Appeals
Nigeria’s New Defense Minister Gusau Allegedly Quits
FURY: Appointment Of Suspected Murderer As Police Minister Insults Yoruba
Boko Haram In Trouble As FG Goes After Sponsors
READ MORE: 
http://Nijahotnews.blogspot.com

What is wrong with miniskirts?

Leave our miniskirts alone,’’ screamed one of the posters held by hundreds of women in Johannesburg, South Africa defending the rights of women to wear miniskirts without harassment. The protest which was an outrage against a young woman who had her clothes torn off by hawkers and taxi drivers for showing too much skin is one in a gale of protests by women in defence of their fashion choices. But that was more than a year ago. Now fast forward to 2014. Miniskirt is grabbing the headlines again! The stylish fashion item loved by women has become the subject of legislation. Now it’s official. Miniskirts are illegal in Uganda and Lagos. I am not surprised about the controversial Uganda Miniskirt law now being challenged by the Amazons in that country. What does one expect of a country where its President, Yoweri Musevini, once denied the existence of HIV/AIDS?
This law banning miniskirts is typical. It re-echoes the regime of another brutal dictator, Idi-Amin, who once considered the miniskirt as a security risk! But that is in Uganda, a country where its leadership mirrors the hypocrisy of African leaders. Now if we pardon the eccentric Musevini, what does one make of Lagos reputed to be governed by a governor who we expect will know better than to endorse decisions that threaten the fashion choices of women in its workforce?  Now let’s review the two miniskirts laws. In Lagos, out of the blues emerged a circular issued from Alausa pronouncing the Fatwa against the wearing of miniskirts. It was reported that the state government has banned all forms of dresses that expose breasts, curves and other sensitive parts of the female body, saying “they are indecent.” This was contained in a circular issued by the Head of Service to entire Ministries, Departments and Agencies. It was said that the decision was taken as a result of worsening cases of indecent dressing among the state government female public servants. The circular urged the state’s officials to immediately move against indecent dressing, mandating public servants to dress ‘’properly’’ and ‘’decently’’ to the office and official functions to portray the good image of the state government. The state government warned that it would begin to take drastic and punitive measures against recalcitrant public servants who flout the directive. The state government has also prescribed a new dress code for female workers.
In Uganda where the miniskirt law is ridiculous as it is draconian, the anti-pornography law states that women who go out wearing miniskirts could face jail term of 10 years or be fined as much as 10 million Ugandan shillings (£2,500) or jailed for up to 10 years, or both.  The passage and ratification of the law banning miniskirts simply mean that criminal charges will be pressed against women of Uganda. In Lagos, female civil servants could be victimised.
Yet, comprehensive definition of what a “miniskirt” entails remains inadequate. Several questions were left unanswered: What length qualifies a skirt to be deemed as a mini? What shall become of traditional attire that at times leaves parts of the body uncovered? I am not suggesting women should expose their nudity in the name of wearing miniskirts.
However, blanket passage of a law that illegalised miniskirts targets women dress choice and gives the government security apparatus enormous powers to interpret what a miniskirt is. Such unregulated definition will lead to victimisation and harassment of women. The constitution doesn’t discriminate against people based on gender, religion and traditions which include varied dress codes. Traditionally speaking, Africans wore just a piece of cloth/skin that left a big portion of the body uncovered.. Why do African leaders leave the real issues to chase shadows? It is possible for the moralists among us to look at these laws and conclude that there is nothing wrong with them.
But there is everything wrong with a law that targets women dress choices and limits their freedom to live their lives the way they please. Why does the society assume that women cannot determine what is good for them? Why does the society believe women must dress and behave in a certain way? Why single out the female gender?  Now my concern is with the mindset of those who propose such bizarre laws. When people find themselves in a position of authority, wake up one day and impose their values on the society using the instrument of their office, then the society should have cause to worry. These laws, in my own view, wrongly target women and stigmatise them. Laws such as the banning of miniskirt symbolically victimise and stereotype women.
It blames them even for crimes that are committed against them. We have often heard when women are blamed for rape. The argument is that women invite rape because they dress in certain way that men cannot resist. It is this blame the victim attitude that gives rise to the miniskirt law. The man who committed the offence is absolved. But we have heard such refrain before? We’ve heard it in courtrooms where women’s fashion choices have been used against them in sexual assault trials.  Or in the workplace, where women’s attire is constantly scrutinised to make sure she doesn’t cause her male colleagues to be so utterly distracted that they are unable to focus on their work. The Alausa miniskirt law is based on such assumption. The fashion police, for example are really the gender police, making sure women dress in ways that make sure men feel comfortable. Nothing can be more dangerous than to use an object worn by women to criminalise the entire womenfolk.
Those countries that make laws limiting the freedom of women further dehumanise them. In extremely patriarchal and religious societies such as Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, India and Afghanistan, women are the subject of sexist and retrogressive laws. Now to my question: If we blame the miniskirt for the degeneracy that has become pervasive in the society, what reason do we now give for the alarming incident of the rape of minors? Or do minors also dress to kill? Is women dress choice responsible for our under development? Both the law in Uganda and the circular banning the miniskirts in Alausa serve to achieve one aim: limit women’s freedom to dress and live their lives in a free and democratic society. Women know what is good for them. We should not legislate what they choose to wear.
Now I fear that women in Alausa will be the subject of victimisation because a certain ‘oga’ bans a certain dress. The Nigerian Police Force has for long harassed women because of vague laws that categorise how a woman should dress. How do they determine indecent dressing? What is decent to one may be offensive to another. A government that establishes and enforces trivial laws against its own people which include and are not limited to laws pertaining to dress code isn’t protecting “morality.” Rather, it is enhancing dictatorship. Leave the miniskirts alone please.

U-17 Women’s World Cup: Nikyu picks Ihezuo, 20 others

Coach of the Nigeria U-17 women’s team, Flamingos, Bala Nikyu has selected Azerbaijan 2012 FIFA U-17 Women’s World Cup silver boot winner, Chiwendu Ihezuo and 20 other players to represent Nigeria at this year’s finals starting in Costa Rica on Saturday, an official of the Nigeria Football Federation has said.
There are also Joy Bokiri, Aminat Yakubu, Uchenna Kanu, Ugochi Emenayo, Mary Ologbosere, Patience Dike and Tessy Biahwo.
Ihezuo, who will captain the squad as Nigeria searches for a first-ever triumph in the competition that was inaugurated in New Zealand in 2008, scored six goals at the last tournament in Azerbaijan to finish second top-scorer, behind North Korea’s Ri Un-Sim.
Just as it happened in Trinidad and Tobago in 2010, when Korea Republic, which eliminated Nigeria after a pulsating quarter-final match that went into extra time, went ahead to lift the trophy, France won the trophy in Azerbaijan two years ago after defeating Nigeria on penalties in the quarterfinals.
Nikyu is confident his girls have prepared well enough to go all the way, after a 19-day final training camp in Faro, Portugal that saw the team win all friendly matches except one – the goalless draw with Belgium’s U-17 women’s team in Brussels on March 4.
Ihezuo scored five goals when the Flamingos humiliated hosts Azerbaijan 11-0 in a group phase match in 2012.
The Nigerian girls flew out of Frankfurt, Germany on Wednesday to arrive in San Jose, capital city of Costa Rica, on Thursday morning. They play their first match against China on Sunday, with other group phase games against Colombia and Mexico to follow on March 19 and 23 respectively.
Team list
Joy Bokiri, Aminat Yakubu, Uchenna Kanu, Rasheedat Ajibade, Fubiana Briggs, Ugochi Emenayo, Ihuoma Onyebuchi, Chinwendu Ihezuo, Onyinye Okeke, Tessy Biahwo, Ayomide Anibaba, Joy Duru, Cynthia Aku, Mary Ologbosere, Faith Alex, Olubunmi Elijah, Vivian Ikechukwu, Augustar Mene, Patience Dike, Mercy Vincent, Desire Ijeh.

TCN to demolish buildings close to electricity installations

The Board of the Transmission Company of Nigeria has warned that it will demolish structures within close proximity to high-powered electricity installations across the country.
It also warned those erecting residential buildings around its electricity installations – both power stations and transmission sub-stations – to cease doing so with immediate effect.
The board issued this warning on Wednesday during an inspection tour of the Enugu Region of the TCN.
The Chairman, TCN Board, Mr. Ibrahim Waziri and former governor of Ebonyi State, Dr. Sam Egwu, led other members of the board on the tour.
Egwu expressed shock that people could risk their lives and that of their family members by living very close to electricity sub-stations and other high-powered installations.
Responding to questions from journalists on buildings close to the Onitsha sub-station, in Anambra State, Egwu said, “It’s not only here we have observed this, we saw it in Port-Harcourt.
“In fact, there is a sub-station where an individual built his residence inside the premises of the TCN, but that is the problem we have in this country.
“We blame the government for most of our problems, yet we cause trouble for ourselves. Otherwise, why should a normal human being risk the life of his entire family by building a residential building close to high power installations, sometimes under high-tension wire?”
He added, “Look at buildings very close to this sub-station; they are not supposed to be built here, but they have decided to defy instructions and build their structures, residential buildings for that matter.
“So, this is a situation we have found and as a board. We are going to look at it and we believe that we are going to take an action that will not be palatable to those who have flouted the laws of the land.”
The former governor was alarmed by the level of decay in the Enugu region.
He, however, said the board was poised to tackle the problems; hence, the visit to all the locations where the TCN had its transmission lines and sub-stations in order to assess the situation.
“We are in these places to know the problem on ground and be able to take a decision that will enable the transmission company to be able to wheel the entire power that will be generated to the distribution companies,” said Egwu.
The Deputy Managing Director, TCN, Mr. Abubakar Atiku, blamed the persistent poor power supply on shortage of gas, which he attributed to pipeline vandalism.
He said, “Before you get this power generated, you must get the raw materials for it and the essential raw material for electricity in Nigeria is gas, and to a certain extent, water.
“For a couple of months, the industry has had a lot of issues with gas; the pipelines are being vandalised and that is principally the reason why we can’t still generate enough.”
In his address, the General Manager, Enugu Region, TCN, Mr. Geoffrey Nwokoye, noted that part of the challenges were that the Okpai-Onitsha DC 330KV transmission line as well as the Benin-Onitsha 330KV transmission line were overdue for mechanised line trace maintenance.

Pistorius’ trial attracting more interest than World Cup

South African media monitoring group, Data Driven Insight, says the ongoing Oscar Pistorius’ murder trial is bigger than the 2014 FIFA World Cup in terms of global media coverage.
This is in spite of the fact that Judge Thokozile Masipa had this week placed restrictions on coverage of parts of the trial in the North Gauteng High Court.
DDI, which is monitoring the case’s global media coverage, said 8,800 unique reports (including Twitter feeds) were published per hour on Day One of the trial on March 3. It added that this increased to 9,200 reports per hour on March 8.
“The data was compiled from 6.2 million social media platforms, including blogs, forums, social networks and commentary, 60 000 global online newspapers, 2000 print publications, as well as 66 radio and television stations,’’ DDI said.
Judge Masipa, who prohibited the media from tweeting information about the post-mortem results of the victim, Reeva Steenkamp, reversed the decision on Tuesday.
On Monday, pathologist Gert Saayman objected to his testimony being broadcast live, saying it would rob Steenkamp of her dignity.
“I believe it is our duty to preserve the dignity of the deceased,” he told the court.