The Spokesman of the division, Col. Muhammmad Dole, made the appeal during an interactive session with newsmen in Maiduguri.
He said “we are appealing to residents to continue praying for us in our ongoing operations against the insurgents.
“We
are also calling on the people to cooperate and assist with useful
information that could help in the success of our operations.’’
He commended the local vigilance group popularly called Civilian JTF for assisting the military in its operations.
He said “I must commend the efforts of the Civilian JTF toward assisting us in ensuring that we succeed in the operations.
“The Civilian JTF is actually adding colour to what the military is doing in the fight against the insurgents.’’
Dole
said although there were some minor lapses on the part of the Civilian
JTF, the overall performance of the vigilance group had been
commendable.
“One important point is that members of Civilian JTF
are not professionals, but surprisingly they have been able to live up
to their expectations,’’ he added.
READ MORE: http://news.naij.com/61614.html
Wednesday, 12 March 2014
Champions League: Messi Helps Barca To Secure Victory, Manchester City Is Out (PHOTO & VIDEO)
Lionel Messi struck again for Barcelona by scoring a superb goal on 67th minute
READ MORE: http://news.naij.com/61629.html
READ MORE: http://news.naij.com/61629.html
Two Alternatives For Boko Haram: Embrace Dialogue, Or Face Full FG’s Might
A
picture taken from a video distributed to journalists in recent days
through intermediaries and obtained by AFP on March 5, 2013 reportedly
shows Abubakar Shekau (center), the suspected leader of Islamist
extremist group, flanked by six armed and hooded
Mark
said that if the Islamist sect would not embrace dialogue with
authorities to address "whatever grievances they may have", the FG
"would be left with no option than to deploy its might" to deal with the
problem."No matter how disgruntled or angry they may be, they cannot continue to kill our citizens and destroy property at will as way of life. "It is a high time wise counsel prevailed among these insurgents to drop their arms and embrace peace," Senate President said.Mark, however, did not disclose what exactly the FG would do should no dialogue happen.
Expressing concern about the increased number of attacks by the insurgents, Mark said that Nigeria has enough challenges to deals with "and certainly does not need these wars and destructions".
"We need to live and work together as free people. We need a country where all citizens have equal opportunities, where no one is oppressed or molested," he added.Mark also sympathised with Benue State governor Gabriel Suswam, who was attacked by gunmen at Tse-Kenyi village while inspecting the destroyed community.
Know more about this news? Update the info!
RELATED ARTICLES:
BOKO HARAM: Nigeria Military Shuts Down Telephone Lines In BornoFIGHT AGAINST BOKO HARAM: "Continue Praying For Us In Our Ongoing Operations - Army Appeals
Nigeria’s New Defense Minister Gusau Allegedly Quits
FURY: Appointment Of Suspected Murderer As Police Minister Insults Yoruba
Boko Haram In Trouble As FG Goes After Sponsors
READ MORE: http://Nijahotnews.blogspot.com
What is wrong with miniskirts?
Leave our miniskirts alone,’’ screamed
one of the posters held by hundreds of women in Johannesburg, South
Africa defending the rights of women to wear miniskirts without
harassment. The protest which was an outrage against a young woman who
had her clothes torn off by hawkers and taxi drivers for showing too
much skin is one in a gale of protests by women in defence of their
fashion choices. But that was more than a year ago. Now fast forward to
2014. Miniskirt is grabbing the headlines again! The stylish fashion
item loved by women has become the subject of legislation. Now it’s
official. Miniskirts are illegal in Uganda and Lagos. I am not surprised
about the controversial Uganda Miniskirt law now being challenged by
the Amazons in that country. What does one expect of a country where its
President, Yoweri Musevini, once denied the existence of HIV/AIDS?
This law banning miniskirts is typical.
It re-echoes the regime of another brutal dictator, Idi-Amin, who once
considered the miniskirt as a security risk! But that is in Uganda, a
country where its leadership mirrors the hypocrisy of African leaders.
Now if we pardon the eccentric Musevini, what does one make of Lagos
reputed to be governed by a governor who we expect will know better than
to endorse decisions that threaten the fashion choices of women in its
workforce? Now let’s review the two miniskirts laws. In Lagos, out of
the blues emerged a circular issued from Alausa pronouncing the Fatwa
against the wearing of miniskirts. It was reported that the state
government has banned all forms of dresses that expose breasts, curves
and other sensitive parts of the female body, saying “they are
indecent.” This was contained in a circular issued by the Head of
Service to entire Ministries, Departments and Agencies. It was said that
the decision was taken as a result of worsening cases of indecent
dressing among the state government female public servants. The circular
urged the state’s officials to immediately move against indecent
dressing, mandating public servants to dress ‘’properly’’ and
‘’decently’’ to the office and official functions to portray the good
image of the state government. The state government warned that it would
begin to take drastic and punitive measures against recalcitrant public
servants who flout the directive. The state government has also
prescribed a new dress code for female workers.
In Uganda where the miniskirt law is
ridiculous as it is draconian, the anti-pornography law states that
women who go out wearing miniskirts could face jail term of 10 years or
be fined as much as 10 million Ugandan shillings (£2,500) or jailed for
up to 10 years, or both. The passage and ratification of the law
banning miniskirts simply mean that criminal charges will be pressed
against women of Uganda. In Lagos, female civil servants could be
victimised.
Yet, comprehensive definition of what a
“miniskirt” entails remains inadequate. Several questions were left
unanswered: What length qualifies a skirt to be deemed as a mini? What
shall become of traditional attire that at times leaves parts of the
body uncovered? I am not suggesting women should expose their nudity in
the name of wearing miniskirts.
However, blanket passage of a law that
illegalised miniskirts targets women dress choice and gives the
government security apparatus enormous powers to interpret what a
miniskirt is. Such unregulated definition will lead to victimisation and
harassment of women. The constitution doesn’t discriminate against
people based on gender, religion and traditions which include varied
dress codes. Traditionally speaking, Africans wore just a piece of
cloth/skin that left a big portion of the body uncovered.. Why do
African leaders leave the real issues to chase shadows? It is possible
for the moralists among us to look at these laws and conclude that there
is nothing wrong with them.
But there is everything wrong with a law
that targets women dress choices and limits their freedom to live their
lives the way they please. Why does the society assume that women cannot
determine what is good for them? Why does the society believe women
must dress and behave in a certain way? Why single out the female
gender? Now my concern is with the mindset of those who propose such
bizarre laws. When people find themselves in a position of authority,
wake up one day and impose their values on the society using the
instrument of their office, then the society should have cause to worry.
These laws, in my own view, wrongly target women and stigmatise them.
Laws such as the banning of miniskirt symbolically victimise and
stereotype women.
It blames them even for crimes that are
committed against them. We have often heard when women are blamed for
rape. The argument is that women invite rape because they dress in
certain way that men cannot resist. It is this blame the victim attitude
that gives rise to the miniskirt law. The man who committed the offence
is absolved. But we have heard such refrain before? We’ve heard it in
courtrooms where women’s fashion choices have been used against them in
sexual assault trials. Or in the workplace, where women’s attire is
constantly scrutinised to make sure she doesn’t cause her male
colleagues to be so utterly distracted that they are unable to focus on
their work. The Alausa miniskirt law is based on such assumption. The
fashion police, for example are really the gender police, making sure
women dress in ways that make sure men feel comfortable. Nothing can be
more dangerous than to use an object worn by women to criminalise the
entire womenfolk.
Those countries that make laws limiting
the freedom of women further dehumanise them. In extremely patriarchal
and religious societies such as Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, India and
Afghanistan, women are the subject of sexist and retrogressive laws. Now
to my question: If we blame the miniskirt for the degeneracy that has
become pervasive in the society, what reason do we now give for the
alarming incident of the rape of minors? Or do minors also dress to
kill? Is women dress choice responsible for our under development? Both
the law in Uganda and the circular banning the miniskirts in Alausa
serve to achieve one aim: limit women’s freedom to dress and live their
lives in a free and democratic society. Women know what is good for
them. We should not legislate what they choose to wear.
Now I fear that women in Alausa will be
the subject of victimisation because a certain ‘oga’ bans a certain
dress. The Nigerian Police Force has for long harassed women because of
vague laws that categorise how a woman should dress. How do they
determine indecent dressing? What is decent to one may be offensive to
another. A government that establishes and enforces trivial laws against
its own people which include and are not limited to laws pertaining to
dress code isn’t protecting “morality.” Rather, it is enhancing
dictatorship. Leave the miniskirts alone please.
U-17 Women’s World Cup: Nikyu picks Ihezuo, 20 others
Coach of the Nigeria U-17 women’s team,
Flamingos, Bala Nikyu has selected Azerbaijan 2012 FIFA U-17 Women’s
World Cup silver boot winner, Chiwendu Ihezuo and 20 other players to
represent Nigeria at this year’s finals starting in Costa Rica on
Saturday, an official of the Nigeria Football Federation has said.
There are also Joy Bokiri, Aminat Yakubu, Uchenna Kanu, Ugochi Emenayo, Mary Ologbosere, Patience Dike and Tessy Biahwo.
Ihezuo, who will captain the squad as
Nigeria searches for a first-ever triumph in the competition that was
inaugurated in New Zealand in 2008, scored six goals at the last
tournament in Azerbaijan to finish second top-scorer, behind North
Korea’s Ri Un-Sim.
Just as it happened in Trinidad and
Tobago in 2010, when Korea Republic, which eliminated Nigeria after a
pulsating quarter-final match that went into extra time, went ahead to
lift the trophy, France won the trophy in Azerbaijan two years ago after
defeating Nigeria on penalties in the quarterfinals.
Nikyu is confident his girls have
prepared well enough to go all the way, after a 19-day final training
camp in Faro, Portugal that saw the team win all friendly matches except
one – the goalless draw with Belgium’s U-17 women’s team in Brussels on
March 4.
Ihezuo scored five goals when the Flamingos humiliated hosts Azerbaijan 11-0 in a group phase match in 2012.
The Nigerian girls flew out of
Frankfurt, Germany on Wednesday to arrive in San Jose, capital city of
Costa Rica, on Thursday morning. They play their first match against
China on Sunday, with other group phase games against Colombia and
Mexico to follow on March 19 and 23 respectively.
Team list
Joy Bokiri, Aminat Yakubu, Uchenna Kanu,
Rasheedat Ajibade, Fubiana Briggs, Ugochi Emenayo, Ihuoma Onyebuchi,
Chinwendu Ihezuo, Onyinye Okeke, Tessy Biahwo, Ayomide Anibaba, Joy
Duru, Cynthia Aku, Mary Ologbosere, Faith Alex, Olubunmi Elijah, Vivian
Ikechukwu, Augustar Mene, Patience Dike, Mercy Vincent, Desire Ijeh.
TCN to demolish buildings close to electricity installations
The Board of the Transmission Company of
Nigeria has warned that it will demolish structures within close
proximity to high-powered electricity installations across the country.
It also warned those erecting
residential buildings around its electricity installations – both power
stations and transmission sub-stations – to cease doing so with
immediate effect.
The board issued this warning on Wednesday during an inspection tour of the Enugu Region of the TCN.
The Chairman, TCN Board, Mr. Ibrahim
Waziri and former governor of Ebonyi State, Dr. Sam Egwu, led other
members of the board on the tour.
Egwu expressed shock that people could
risk their lives and that of their family members by living very close
to electricity sub-stations and other high-powered installations.
Responding to questions from journalists
on buildings close to the Onitsha sub-station, in Anambra State, Egwu
said, “It’s not only here we have observed this, we saw it in
Port-Harcourt.
“In fact, there is a sub-station where
an individual built his residence inside the premises of the TCN, but
that is the problem we have in this country.
“We blame the government for most of our
problems, yet we cause trouble for ourselves. Otherwise, why should a
normal human being risk the life of his entire family by building a
residential building close to high power installations, sometimes under
high-tension wire?”
He added, “Look at buildings very close
to this sub-station; they are not supposed to be built here, but they
have decided to defy instructions and build their structures,
residential buildings for that matter.
“So, this is a situation we have found
and as a board. We are going to look at it and we believe that we are
going to take an action that will not be palatable to those who have
flouted the laws of the land.”
The former governor was alarmed by the level of decay in the Enugu region.
He, however, said the board was poised
to tackle the problems; hence, the visit to all the locations where the
TCN had its transmission lines and sub-stations in order to assess the
situation.
“We are in these places to know the
problem on ground and be able to take a decision that will enable the
transmission company to be able to wheel the entire power that will be
generated to the distribution companies,” said Egwu.
The Deputy Managing Director, TCN, Mr.
Abubakar Atiku, blamed the persistent poor power supply on shortage of
gas, which he attributed to pipeline vandalism.
He said, “Before you get this power
generated, you must get the raw materials for it and the essential raw
material for electricity in Nigeria is gas, and to a certain extent,
water.
“For a couple of months, the industry
has had a lot of issues with gas; the pipelines are being vandalised and
that is principally the reason why we can’t still generate enough.”
In his address, the General Manager,
Enugu Region, TCN, Mr. Geoffrey Nwokoye, noted that part of the
challenges were that the Okpai-Onitsha DC 330KV transmission line as
well as the Benin-Onitsha 330KV transmission line were overdue for
mechanised line trace maintenance.
Pistorius’ trial attracting more interest than World Cup
South African media monitoring group, Data Driven Insight, says the ongoing Oscar Pistorius’ murder trial is bigger than the 2014 FIFA World Cup in terms of global media coverage.
This is in spite of the fact that Judge
Thokozile Masipa had this week placed restrictions on coverage of parts
of the trial in the North Gauteng High Court.
DDI, which is monitoring the case’s
global media coverage, said 8,800 unique reports (including Twitter
feeds) were published per hour on Day One of the trial on March 3. It
added that this increased to 9,200 reports per hour on March 8.
“The data was compiled from 6.2 million
social media platforms, including blogs, forums, social networks and
commentary, 60 000 global online newspapers, 2000 print publications, as
well as 66 radio and television stations,’’ DDI said.
Judge Masipa, who prohibited the media
from tweeting information about the post-mortem results of the victim,
Reeva Steenkamp, reversed the decision on Tuesday.
On Monday, pathologist Gert Saayman
objected to his testimony being broadcast live, saying it would rob
Steenkamp of her dignity.
“I believe it is our duty to preserve the dignity of the deceased,” he told the court.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






